My New Website

aaliyan.home.blog

Search This Blog

Saturday, 15 September 2018

Sharing is caring is not a good idea.

21st century is kiss my ass century. Buy a Christmas tree, celebrate a fantasy and then think God "bestowed" happiness, anyways that is the picture of happiness as I see in the school of my sister, which is Christian anyway. How we calculate things interestingly show us our ability to function well in our worlds. Today, my sister did what I described in my blog earlier, of all the trees of informations blessed to her, the end result was that she used her smart attitude and a sense of numbers to do... do what? create financial statements and organize cash flow for dad? nope. Instead, she took the receipt of things we bought yesterday and she lined or crossed "Oreo Mini" which cost dad 55 RS,.... and left what I bought so when dad later sees the receipt, my sister can make me a scapegoat and say to dad that I bought things that cost 20 RS. but that since I bought 2 things, so 20 x 2 = 40 RS. There you have it, so she's making dad realize that I'm "wasting" his money, but wait? what about her. No she's pure! For all the smartness in mathematics and for all her knowledge, was this the place where her intellect should be used up on? to do social tricks to hide her sins and distract dad by creating a bad image of me? and by making a scapegoat of me? yes, Robert Greene from 48 LAWS OF POWER was right. There is a good experience and a great experience. This kind of experience I, and yes I, is the former one. The great experience is that I eat a candy that costs 1 RS. but gives me pleasure that I bought it without any social trickeries. I would rather prefer that experience to the experience of having bought 55 RS. expensive sweets but with this sort of manipulation. But still, buying a 1 RS. candy when other kids can buy 100 RS.+ sweets sucks. Why? because not only do those kids are filthy sweet people, but are fat. Coach Sommer said that you only need to make One decision and then just act once you made that decision. I don't totally agree with that, but a little bit. Because if you just make "one decision, then by definition you don't have to critisize your behaviours. What I ought to apply is a version of it, which is "once you choose one position, you just need to act and forget about everything else". If I chose myself and my position to be, say top 30, in whatever competition I'm in, then I have to maintain my actions so I just maintain that position in that particular competition. As for other competition, let the luck decide initially what position to take and then, if it's not good for my health, then cut back on it and eliminate the whole competition. For me, when I ask this question, "If I had a gun/any noun/dream, to my head and I had to eliminate unidisciplinarity in my life, how would I do it?" basically I'm just playing this game by engaging my visual senses to matters other people are blind to. This is basically a repetition trick. Another thing I would love to mention is that once you choose the right people to whom you want to clear the path for, nothing is a problem. For example, If I hate my boss, then I would have a lot of problem doing my job upto my full potential. The antidote is to just find those people inside the chaos that you'd be really happy to clear the path for. Those are the people who are really, really above you and their knowledge provides you with a practical book where you can choose what lesson to learn everyday, it's like Practical knowledge bites, everyday! One of the curse of 21st century is the dictum "Sharing is caring". What most people think caring means is to sacrifice your own crystal of options for the sake of wants of someone else... really? Why would I NOT take my crystal of options (CoOp) just because someone else thinks that I should "care". Is sharing really just ONE way of caring? can't you care WITHOUT really sharing? Can't you just play your game and then rather than sharing your crystal of options, you rather share your EXPERIENCE with it, later, in forms of different kinds of content? Can't you share these experiences and write a book about those things to create bites of knowledge? Can't you just share EXPERIENCE rather than OPPORTUNITY? Can't you just blog about it on Blogger, like I do? Can't you let other person take the opportunity if he plays better than you? So that you ask him if you can SIT with him while he's EXPERIENCING THE OPPORTUNITY and you take notes and write your own bites of knowledge and then PLAY YOUR GAME by taking advantage of another OPPORTUNITY and then repeat the process by sharing YOUR EXPERIENCE instead of OPPORTUNITIES with someone else who's junior than you? Can't that be done? Why is your attitude like that of "If I take this opportunity, I will squander it and none of players involved in the game will have any EXPERIENCE?". You see the danger in this sort of thinking? You see how greed and reward/punishment superresponse tendency interferes with our rational decision-making process? Well, that's is something that happens in Pakistan DAILY, one example is bad accounting done by my sister. She wants to kill her record to put attention to my record so she can later take the opportunity and I don't get that opportunity because my parents would think that I need "punishment" or withdrawal? I've learnt this is what GOOD experience means. Anything that does NOT have those phenomenons I talked about above is a great experience. Just as, according to the book "The Intelligent Investor", you can get in trouble for a damn good idea, so this good idea of "Sharing is Caring" is just that: a GOOD idea, NOT a great idea. My personal life demonstrates this. And that example of how little Maheen, another spolied kid, choose to play Luddo. Her attitude was classic Sharing is caring one. How she told other players that "she just wants to share" and just played herself, a fucking 5 YEAR OLD girl with this much amount of MANIPULATION?! God, she was she was inadequate to play with adults in that board game and me? you can guess my respect in family that an 18-year-old has to play for a fucking 6 YEAR OLD?! Why? Why is SHE superior? BECAUSE SHE IS A GIRL and I AM A MAN and since society thinks that man should SHARE!!!!! GOD, FLAWED SOCIAL MECHANICS. My own sister is 13 years old and yes, she manipulates her own dad. What else can I say. I gave enough proof. So later, when I'm leaving don't ask me that you respected me. I can sincerely hope that I seperate and them and we never meet again. May God accept my words.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are welcome

Our Advertisers