The difficult choice every man has to make...

Something reminds me of the story predicted in Point Break. In attempting to catch attention, and this includes me, we think we are changing the world. We sacrifice our values taught to us when we were kids in 3 or 4 class. Like when a man like "the Tax guy" Robin Hood sacrificed the basic human value, which was to not steal, and gave that money to poor and the unearned. When military becomes an abomination and becomes 100x Frankenstein. When thousands give their life on the name of "change". Any change that requires mass sacrifice, is just a fraud in history like the Agricultural Revolution, the biggest fraud in the history of mankind. The Government breaks, one man becomes powerful and in the process, the constitution consists of the rights of "society" or nation, rather than the rights of a commoner or citizen. I just think we don't have mechanisms to empower creative people. This just doesn't relate to street artists who are not willing to put effort to increase their total, well-rounded knowledge and are not willing to trade labor. I believe the votes don't exist. When bunch of irrational people give votes on their whims and personal short-term interests, they screw up the long-term future of their ownselves. There's nothing that police can do to stop it. There's nothing government can do to stop it. A human has the right to live his/her life to its fullest. But, I would quote Commentator Peter Drury and his Co-commentator Jim Begling from PES 2017, "Ambition must be complemented with the right amount of caution".

It makes sense to alliance with bunch of aliens. Like the Transformers series. These things use Energons. Here's the interesting part. When the dad asked me, "You've been studying electronics in physics for quite a while? tell me what's n-p-n?" and I was like, "Well, dad n-p-n is basically three sides. The top-right side consists of free electrons and they pass through the valence band and in the next side, they form ions". What he replied with is exactly the reason why we should all be fearful, "Look, that theory is of no use to you. You are an electronics person blah blah blah and you should answer me n-p-n is a type of connection in transistors. That theory is ONLY to be used by those manufacturing Transistors." Now this is precisely the problem. It wouldn't hurt for me to pick those ideas, even though I have nothing to do with electronics. Like in some post earlier, I said, ''What if we have some new kind of N-P-N or maybe new kind of semiconductors that can be used to perform more states than two". I later discovered, this is called, "Multi-level logic". This idea didn't come to ME before I studied that theory of semi-conductors and N-P-N. It would have been easy for me to say, "I'm not interested". I hate that. I hate the fact that my parents first would say these things to me, and when later my performance would suffer, they would say, "You didn't study enough." What?

Look, it is clear, by doing synthesis of ideas, you are aiming to create Transformers. You are aiming to combine fission or fusion reactions, and plasma like methods to generate power, and then you are combing that with the field of robotics. You don't get to do what's already done. By studying semi-conductors, I wouldn't build transistors and sell them. That's already been done. I wouldn't do that. Rather I would combine that with research focusing on new areas, like application of Fusion reaction for power generation. Or I would even combine the concept of energy with solar power and then I would combine that with my knowledge of behavioural psychology and how users perceive "user-friendly" products. I can use B = MAT equation (Behaviour = Motivation, Ability, Trigger). The Sun is Sun. Billions of explosions happen 24/7, we can't even predict that, or I can't even think of how that happens sitting here with undershirts on and a Pajama and with mom calling me to get her a balance card.

Let's think of some creative options. The new application of Kinetic motion and using data science to predict Trajectories of football, when the player shoots a ball and shows some skill. They can sense that motion, and then using combination of various disciplines, Adidas aims to empower the football industry with technology. That's why we have boots that can count steps and tell if athlete is putting too much pressure on the ground when running. It can do wonders. We have to get used to going alone. If there's one thing I've learnt in the last few months, its that most of the times, you won't get support and on days, you would want to cry to death.

To be brutally honest, I've been shocked time and again by the fact that girls can be so easily enticed to trade short-term pleasure for long-term gain. For example, I know in Pakistan, the secret to making your girls perform in school is to prefer them being "Prefects" and monitors, rather than boys. Such illusionous domination gives them a sense of control (I don't support this theory, but I'm telling you from my wrenched experience). But that comes at the cost of self-esteem of boys. The way men learn to handle that from an early age, or from series of exposure again and again, after failing and letting girls take charge over and over, finally men learn the secret to getting "rid" of girls is to actually trade short-term pleasure for long-term advantage, on a consistent basis. Samara, from Point Break, surfs and basically, her pleasure is in the sea or nature. The Bodhi is selfish. But the girl is like an altruist. So Bodhi takes advantage of her, and adds her to the gang. Now that is how you deal with girls. You can't shun them. This is why societies who pressurize their women are fucked-up and basically there's no law in country which hasn't learnt how to "trade short-term pleasure of women quickly in a daily basis and as if pleasure was only their income, and then trading that with long-term gain". Believe me, there's a power in this equation.

But to figure out this riddle, we must think about the question; "Is nature really cruel to man?" Or the best explanation for that is because men and women both are required to navigate this structure, Is that the consequence of actions of individual beings in their particular circle of control? Maybe that is why we need women to be "NOT-SO-SERIOUS" with their own selves. Trust me, women can get a bit "culty" and they actually start worshiping their men. Like in the movie "Deep Blue Sea", as in the last scene, the girl is so blind with her beauty and in the love of "peace", that she nearly gives up her life. That is dangerous. I see this pattern time and again. Like in the movie Constantine, Isabel quits her life and her sister employs Constantine. In the process, she (The Cop girl) still gives herself up so that sister Isabel can later mate and... you get the idea. In the end, it all winds up at men.

Really this is a constant battle. In future, we would see a lot of women employed in such places as SpaceX. If the nature has decided men just can't "leave" women, it is in their best interest to actually employ them and then give them ice creams daily. I don't know why. Girls are just that way. Maybe the nature has been built that way. And please notice, when I say "short-term pleasure", your thoughts should extend to more than one kind of pleasure. Like my sister, in order to get her to clear the obstacles from my path, I have to bribe her up with "contracts" (which I believe is bullshit and ridiculous) which says, "I, Aaliyan Zahid, promise to give Fatima ice creams for three days". Maybe that's an investment into a long-term relationship. The trick is to keep maintaining productivity, whether you have to "trade short-term benefits for long-term gains".