Vigilance and care

Life is like being vigilant of things. But how do I be vigilant? Ask this question: If I had a [Dream] to my head and I had to eliminate unidisciplinarity in my life, how would I do it? This question is so important that you use a Cause using this question to develop an effect and you get both cause and effect at the same time. Now Say I use, a dream plus something that I'm fearful of, say: "If I had a McLaren and a gun to my head and I had to eliminate unidisciplinarity in my life, how would I do it?". Another may be of something like this, "If I had a biscuit of love and a gun to my head and I had to eliminate unidisciplinarity in my life, how would I do it?". This is how you can outdo those big automobile-like big unicorns. Say, I watched the movie The Tuxedo, and I'm inspired by Del Blaine. Now what do I do? watch the movie again and again while eating nuts in the skimmed milk? yes maybe, but not without asking this question: "If I had Del Blaine to my head and I had to eliminate unidisciplinarity in my life, how would I do it?". This is how I came up with the idea of an "alternate cash flow". This is how I maintained my sense of "Always Pay Yourself First" in a difficult time in my life. Often when I think of that, this song which is Get Lucky by Daft Punk comes to my mind. I think of Camilla Cabillo and say I'm inspired, what do I do? maybe ask this question, "If I had camilla cabillo and a mclaren with guns to my head and I had to eliminate unidisciplinarity in THREE phases of my life, how would I do it?". It's my job to perform these variations of this question at various points in my life. People like Terry Crews and Robert Kiyosaki and Tim Ferriss have similar questions, which is "What would a rich man do?" for Terry, "If Buckminister Fuller was in Finance, what would he do or say?" for Robert Kiyosaki and for Timothy, it is "What would Matt Mullenweg do or say?", because you don't always have to be listening to songs from the that new album of your favourite artist in order to be inspired. Which means I can ask that Camilla Cabilo question and still be okay. In life, you don't always have to be near your lover/inspiration/idol/mentor. Who you're trying to imitate, using questions like above, you can always imitate their character in difficult situations and then not just practice it but with a great amount of de-fucking later, which may include getting a wrong answer with a slightly complicated method and then turning that slightly complicated method into a bit easy or simple using that unidisciplinarity cause and effect question and that's how you first de-fuck that problem. Only then can you solve it. It's a common habit of smart people to fuck problems and to slightly complicate questions so that less smart people have difficulty seeing a solution. It's a bad attitude, I know. But when your ability to be "distinguished" depends upon how many times you can fuck people less smarter than you, that's how you become competitive, right? that's what those lower class Physics professors want, to take the money from the so called "dumb" rich people and steal all that money away from them. Nothing could be more wrong. This is fact. Rich people know that. Only by asking that question, or its variants, which is this: "If I had a [noun/activity/dream/fearful object] to my head and I had to eliminate unidisciplinarity in my life, how would I do it?" is how I can de-fuck these problems designed by professors with crooked intentions and actually maintain my status. Thankfully.